The full agenda — with receipts

Ceremonial opener with limited substantive content, but the guest list and framing speeches typically signal which policy and market themes (charging infrastructure targets, subsidy debates, grid capacity) the organizers expect to dominate the year. Charging professionals should treat this as a barometer for the fair's political tone rather than a source of new data.

A press-and-industry-only preview of the launches on show is where OEMs typically reveal how seriously they're treating charging compatibility, bundled charging offers, and V2G-ready hardware — details that rarely make it into consumer-facing material. Worth attending to see which brands are pairing vehicle launches with charging or energy partnerships versus treating charging as an afterthought.

V2G has moved from lab pilots to home deployment claims within a year, and this session pairs an automaker (Polestar) with a utility/CPO (Norlys) — the two sides that actually determine whether bidirectional charging scales commercially. Key questions: what hardware and tariff standards are needed for V2H to work for ordinary households, and who captures the value — the driver, the utility, or the aggregator?

A crowdsourced consumer Q&A is a useful proxy for what's still confusing or worrying buyers about EV ownership — historically charging cost, home installation, and public network reliability rank high. Charging providers should mine this for recurring objections that marketing and product design haven't yet solved.

A panel spanning an OEM (Toyota), a consumer body (FDM), a marketplace (Bilbasen), and an energy/charging player (Norlys) tackling residual buyer hesitancy — likely centered on charging access, resale uncertainty, and total cost of ownership. The real test is whether the panel offers concrete data (uptime stats, cost comparisons) or just reassurance; charging professionals should listen for which objections still lack a solid answer.

A networking evening with Mobility Denmark, not a content session — its value to charging professionals is relational: informal access to OEMs, CPOs, and policymakers ahead of next year's infrastructure and tariff discussions.

A guided walkthrough of showcased models from FDM's podcast team will surface which battery sizes, charging speeds, and connector standards are becoming default in 2024-25 releases — useful raw input for anyone forecasting network load or fast-charger dimensioning. No independent data should be assumed beyond what's stated on the show floor.

A YouTuber's framing that daily-charging logistics is *the* deciding question for first-time buyers confirms what the charging industry already assumes but rarely gets said this bluntly to a consumer audience. Whether the session offers actual guidance (home charger economics, apartment-dweller options) or just repeats the framing is the thing to check.

FDM's consumer economist promises a market overview of charging options and even earning potential (V2G/smart charging) for private owners — this is the closest thing on the program to a structured charging-market briefing, and worth attending for how it frames pricing transparency and monetization claims to a lay audience. Charging professionals should check whether the "earning money" claims are backed by real tariff/aggregator data or remain aspirational.

Repeat of the day-one consumer Q&A — same value: a live read on which charging- and cost-related questions buyers keep asking, useful for spotting unresolved friction points in the market.

Motorsport (F1, Formula E, Le Mans) has historically been a testbed for battery and fast-charging technology later filtering into production EVs; the session's value hinges on whether concrete technology transfer examples are given rather than general enthusiasm for racing. Relevant to anyone tracking where next-generation charging speed or battery chemistry improvements originate.

Podcast-style practical advice for new EV owners will likely touch on charging habits and cost management, though without named data the value depends on whether the hosts cite real pricing or just anecdote. Useful mainly as a gauge of what "common sense" charging advice looks like to the mainstream car-buying public.

This session targets the exact confusion point CPOs and hardware vendors need to solve: a consumer association's economist framing charging choice as unclear and potentially profit-generating (V2G/V2H implied). Watch for what FDM tells mainstream buyers about tariffs, smart charging and payback claims — that framing will shape demand more than any spec sheet. Relevant to anyone selling home chargers, dynamic tariffs or bidirectional products in the Danish market.

A YouTube car reviewer telling first-time EV buyers to plan daily charging before purchase signals that charging access, not vehicle range, remains the primary adoption barrier for mainstream Danish consumers. Charging providers should note which pain points (home charging access, public network reliability, cost predictability) get surfaced here, since this is unfiltered consumer sentiment rather than industry messaging.

A vehicle showcase framed around what to look for on the show floor — useful for tracking which OEMs and models are gaining traction and, indirectly, what onboard charging specs (AC/DC max rates, connector types, bidirectional readiness) buyers will be asking about at the charge point. No charging-specific content is indicated, so value here is competitive intelligence on vehicle mix, not infrastructure.

This is a live Q&A pulling real questions from FDM members and fairgoers, making it a direct read on where mainstream EV buyers still get stuck — likely charging cost, home installation, and public network trust given the panel mix. Charging operators and installers should treat the actual questions asked as market research: they reveal what's still unresolved for the average buyer despite years of industry messaging.